[FusionWeb] Forum Hierarchy/Layout + Misc Forum stuff

[Jeffrey Laramie]

On Friday 29 June 2007 10:23, RYX wrote:
> Am Freitag, den 29.06.2007, 12:52 +0200 schrieb Guillaume Seguin:
> > 2007/6/29, Will Farrington <wcfarrington at gmail.com>:
> > > RYX and I are just starting to get to work on setting up the forum
> > > (we're both busy folk), but, before we get too far in-depth, we wanted
> > > to bring up a quick discussion to determine the layout/hierarchy of the
> > > forums so we can get those made real quick-like.
> > >
> > > Keep in mind that subforums can be buried as deep as you want (eg:
> > > http://img224.imageshack.us/img224/935/examplejq7.png ) and we can
> > > customize how many subforums are shown, etc etc, all very easily.
> > >
> > > Just a note for proposal layouts:
> > >
> > > Forum Category
> > > --Forum
> > > ----Subforum lvl 1
> > > ------Subforum lvl 2
> > > etc
> > >
> > > Personally, I'd like to keep to something more akin to the Compiz.org
> > > layout, utilizing some nice organizational skills, rather than throwing
> > > things in a big pile.
> > >
> > >
> > > ---
> > >
> > > In a similar matter, we need a list of usergroups that folks want made.
> > > Personally, the way I think it should be is this:
> > >
> > > (*) All support, developers, mods, etc have full moderational powers
> > > across the entire forum (aka global moderators).
> >
> > I think that developers shouldn't have moderational powers (they have
> > other things to do imho), we should leave that to support people &
> > moderators.
>
> That's what came to my mind, too. I think devs don't need any special
> rights and I assume they don't want them as well. If a dev wants/needs
> to be a moderator (e.g. Mike), then we can do it on an individual basis.

Agreed

Jeff