[FusionDev] Release

[Sam Spilsbury]

It might seem a bit weird at first, but I think people will get used
to it. I have always been confused by Ubuntu's version numbering -
which starts at 4.04, instead of 1.

I suppose we can just use Compiz' version numbering.

Regards


Sam

On 8/12/07, Kristian Lyngstøl <kristian at bohemians.org> wrote:
> On 8/11/07, Danny Baumann <dannybaumann at web.de> wrote:
> > > Also, I think it makes sense to use a version number independent of
> > > Compiz, to signify that we are not the same thing. Stuff like ccs and
> > > most of these new plugins  are, well, new, and since these bits are
> > > what Compiz Fusion really is, it makes sense to me to use a different
> > > version range.
> >
> > I don't think that makes too much sense. The plugins fully depend on the
> > Compiz API, and ccs depends to some extent (read: the plugin) on it too,
> > so I think it makes sense to use the Compiz versioning scheme as a base.
> > How do you want to explain to users that version 0.1.1 of Compiz Fusion
> > needs Compiz 0.5.2, and release 0.3.5 needs Compiz 0.7.4? IMO, that just
> > will bring along more con-fusion (SCNR) than needed.
>
> True. It would've been easier if Compiz wasn't part of the Compiz
> Fusion name...  Oh well, we'll just have to use the same version
> numbers. I sort of wanted to signify to the users that this is, in
> fact, the first release (and that the third is the third one, etc).
>
> --
> Regards,
> Kristian
> _______________________________________________
> Dev mailing list
> Dev at lists.compiz-fusion.org
> http://lists.compiz-fusion.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
>