[FusionDev] Release

[Danny Baumann]

Hi,

> I have one issue though; the wrapper script.
> 
> I'd like to move my compiz-manager script into a more central/official
> repo and get proper feedback without getting 20 different forks of it
> (it's a pain, to be honest, to be sent a rewrite of your own code
> instead of ideas on how to improve it or patches). Any objections
> against this?

Nope, no objections.

> Also, I think it makes sense to use a version number independent of
> Compiz, to signify that we are not the same thing. Stuff like ccs and
> most of these new plugins  are, well, new, and since these bits are
> what Compiz Fusion really is, it makes sense to me to use a different
> version range.

I don't think that makes too much sense. The plugins fully depend on the
Compiz API, and ccs depends to some extent (read: the plugin) on it too,
so I think it makes sense to use the Compiz versioning scheme as a base.
How do you want to explain to users that version 0.1.1 of Compiz Fusion
needs Compiz 0.5.2, and release 0.3.5 needs Compiz 0.7.4? IMO, that just
will bring along more con-fusion (SCNR) than needed.

Regards,

Danny