[FusionComm] 2 divisions or 2 projects?

[Jeffrey Laramie]

On Tuesday 10 July 2007 19:43, RYX wrote:
> This plan assumes that we are two communities, which is total
> nonsense ... This document needs a revision - that's all I am talking
> about. It was a first draft, nothing more.

I don't know what you are talking about Rico. It was labeled a draft only 
because we wanted to get input from the community before making it final, not 
because we were still debating it. In fact this was one of several 
announcements I held off publishing for weeks in an attempt to coordinate it 
with the site revisions and the release of 0.4 and 0.5. I clearly stated in 
my next post that if there were no objections from the community it would be 
adopted. There was no objection from the community and it was supposed to 
have been posted on the wiki.

http://forum.compiz.org/viewtopic.php?t=677

This represents the decision of the Compiz admins and the Compiz community and 
nobody but you has ever questioned it's legitimacy (although I don't think 
Mike agreed with the decision). It served as the basis of our discussions on 
re-uniting and is supported by David and every former beryl dev I've spoken 
with. If you think it needs to be revised, fine. I've asked you before to 
propose revisions and you never did. But please stop trying to re-write 
history and re-open decisions that have already been made.

Jeff