[FusionAdmin] 2nd Round

[Jeffrey Laramie]

On Saturday 21 July 2007 16:53, Alyssa Hung wrote:
> Jeffrey Laramie wrote:
> > On Wednesday 18 July 2007 09:56, Jeffrey Laramie wrote:
> >> Hey all,
> >>
> >> We need to wrap up voting in the 2nd round. Let's end voting on Thursday
> >> the 19th at midnight UTC. If you haven't voted yet:
> >
> > OK. Voting is over and the results are quite interesting. First off, a
> > majority preferred option 3 which allows the community to make the final
> > selection. Given the high quality of the finalists I think this is a safe
> > choice.
> >
> > The results of the 2nd round have the 3 top designs all from the same
> > artist. I agree that these are all very nice, however I'm a  bit
> > concerned about giving the community a vote but only giving them one
> > artist to choose from. Given the extremely low number of votes cast in
> > the 2nd round, I would feel better including one design from each of
> > other top 2 artists for a total of 5 choices. What do you guys think?
> >
> > Jeff
>
> All the most popular designs coming from the same artist is exactly what
> I was worried about when I first posted my comment about having a
> minimum number of artists in the vote. I fully agree that the most
> highly-rated works of 2 other finalists be included. :)
>
> With that said, there seems to be a tie for the third item. The
> second-most-highly-rated item is Nécropotame's #5, which received a net
> score of 1. But Daleduro's #2 and OpenArtist's #3 both received a net
> score of 0, which makes them tied for third place.
>
> Would we include all 4 artists (for a total of 6 choices), then? Or
> somehow choose between Daleduro or OpenArtist's submission? Or perhaps
> have another round of voting, but excluding Graphreak's works, to
> determine the other two finalists?

I'm fine with having 6 choices if that's OK with everyone else. We could have 
a public elimination round in the same time it takes us to have another poll.

Jeff